Statistical Sampling: an Underestimated Element of Process Validation?
In a recent FDA Warning Letter, the FDA criticized inadequate process validation for a semi-solid dosage form. What exactly did the FDA find inadequate?
The validation studies were criticized for not reflecting inter- and intra-batch variability. In particular, there was criticism that the sampling was random. The viscosity sampling scheme does not lead to statistical confidence in process performance.
In a second Process Performance Qualification (PPQ) study, the influence of a critical excipient on viscosity was to be shown. Again, the FDA criticized that no inter-batch variability was demonstrated. This is not surprising, since only one run was performed.
As measures, the FDA requires:
- a validation programme, starting with product development, the validation itself and the control/monitoring of the processes with regard to intra- and inter-batch variability
- an equipment and premises qualification programme
- a programme for Process Performance Qualification and Continued Process Verification measures.
You can find the entire Warning Letter on the FDA website.
Related GMP News
02.09.2026Cloud Computing: Authorities' Expectations od Cloud Service Providers?
26.08.2026Cloud Computing: IT Infrastructure Qualification by a SAAS Provider
26.08.2026Detailed Analysis of the PIC/S Document 'Recommendations on Qualification and Validation' - Part II
19.08.2026Cloud Computing: How can CSPs Achieve the Annex 11 Requirement of Qualified Infrastructure?
19.08.2026Detailed Analysis of the PIC/S Document 'Recommendations on Qualification and Validation' - Part I
12.08.2026Media Fill - What are the FDA's Issues?



